Register | Search | FAQ | Memberlist | Usergroups | Forum rules | Log in
Reply to topic

Should Australia get a rematch??
yes
26%
 26%  [ 12 ]
no
73%
 73%  [ 34 ]
Total Votes : 46

Grass Roots

Joined: 12 Nov 2005
Posts: 327
Reply with quote
andyf888 wrote:
Whoever think there should be a rematch has never watched football before. If that game was the final and italy won the cup, there wouldnt be a rematch. NO REMATCH! What a stupid suggestion.


What a STUPID response to our friends question. So hang on a minute, all the matches I've been to were just an illusion? Go back to school.

Grass Roots

Joined: 12 Nov 2005
Posts: 327
Reply with quote
scanlon30 wrote:
yep but untill technology is introduced
having a rematch is not even option
its stupid


Well done you're getting better at English, not quite there yet though matey Wink

Grass Roots

Joined: 12 Nov 2005
Posts: 327
Reply with quote
yeekiat wrote:
We need to run IQ tests before letting people start topics ...


not feeling so smart now eh? the question was should, not would.

If I say you should think before a smartass comment like that, I'm not saying you would think.

Should & Would, Two different word, Two different meanings, it's not rocket science.

It's amazing the people who jump on the bandwagon slandering a new member in the forums. Their IQ's are more questionable.

Grass Roots

Joined: 15 Mar 2006
Posts: 196
Reply with quote
Spurs4ever wrote:
yeekiat wrote:
We need to run IQ tests before letting people start topics ...


not feeling so smart now eh? the question was should, not would.

If I say you should think before a smartass comment like that, I'm not saying you would think.

Should & Would, Two different word, Two different meanings, it's not rocket science.

It's amazing the people who jump on the bandwagon slandering a new member in the forums. Their IQ's are more questionable.

it was a joke mate its called having a laugh
i thought you would have a sence of humour being a Spurs fan

Grass Roots

Joined: 12 Nov 2005
Posts: 327
Reply with quote
fair enough and your English is improving, well done Wink

Grass Roots

Joined: 15 Mar 2006
Posts: 196
Reply with quote
same joke twice your hilarious

Grass Roots

Joined: 12 Nov 2005
Posts: 327
Reply with quote
scanlon30 wrote:
same joke twice your hilarious


I know Laughing

Young Pro

Joined: 19 Aug 2005
Posts: 1962
Location: Tokyo - Japan Supports: FC Barcelona
Reply with quote
yeekiat wrote:
We need to run IQ tests before letting people start topics ...


Can japan have a re-match with Australia?
We would beat you and you wouldnt get to the second round. Razz

Can japan have a re-match with Croatia starting a this moment:


Young Pro

Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 2384
Location: Ireland
Reply with quote
There's to many drunk angry fans on ere. We know the question was "Should" not "Would" but if they "should" get a reamtch for that we should get a rematch against Holland for Euro 88

Senior Pro

Joined: 04 Dec 2005
Posts: 4410
Location: Singapore
Reply with quote
Should/Would - the answers are both no!

And its even more daft if its phrased with "should" in my opinion!

Grass Roots

Joined: 10 Jun 2006
Posts: 122
Location: Reading
Reply with quote
Spurs4ever wrote:
andyf888 wrote:
Whoever think there should be a rematch has never watched football before. If that game was the final and italy won the cup, there wouldnt be a rematch. NO REMATCH! What a stupid suggestion.


What a STUPID response to our friends question. So hang on a minute, all the matches I've been to were just an illusion? Go back to school.


Do you think there should be a rematch

Grass Roots

Joined: 24 Jun 2006
Posts: 31
Reply with quote
ITALIANO wrote:
bresciano took an excellent dive when materazzi fouled him...please!!! iI wish there was a rematch...italy in good condition will always stuff these guys that could not create a single chance to score aginst a team in 10 men


haha he got tripped over!!! your player kicked him.... and also he does have an italian heritage.... what does that say!!! DIVERS!!!

Grass Roots

Joined: 23 Jun 2006
Posts: 130
Reply with quote
well Kilby you're right.... Laughing he is iof italian origin and plays in Italy...grosso could be in the next olimpics diving squad....eh eh

Grass Roots

Joined: 30 Jun 2006
Posts: 41
Location: uk
Reply with quote
Tottenham didn't get a rematch when most of their players were struck down with food poisoning just be4 the Arsenal match, so why should a team get a rematch for a bad reffereeing decision, expeciously in a cup game, It would just upset the game, its a part of football.
If referees didn't make mistakes, and teams didn't mess up, it would be like watching robots.

Moderator

Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 12936
Location: Location: Reading Supports: Reading -Official_Hideout_Treasurer-
Reply with quote
u1bd2005 wrote:
Tottenham didn't get a rematch when most of their players were struck down with food poisoning just be4 the Arsenal match, so why should a team get a rematch for a bad reffereeing decision, expeciously in a cup game, It would just upset the game, its a part of football.
If referees didn't make mistakes, and teams didn't mess up, it would be like watching robots.


dont you mean before the West Ham match?

Grass Roots

Joined: 30 Jun 2006
Posts: 41
Location: uk
Reply with quote
Yeah probably, Im a Newcastle fan myself so I don't really know.

Grass Roots

Joined: 12 Nov 2005
Posts: 327
Reply with quote
u1bd2005 wrote:
Tottenham didn't get a rematch when most of their players were struck down with food poisoning just be4 the Arsenal match, so why should a team get a rematch for a bad reffereeing decision, expeciously in a cup game, It would just upset the game, its a part of football.
If referees didn't make mistakes, and teams didn't mess up, it would be like watching robots.


Well let's see? If football was a sport without diving, without malicious conduct, without over-zealous refereeing, without short sighted linesmen, without doubts about whether the ball crossed the line or not, without backhanders and bribes, then it'd be boring?

They used to say that the game lost something when they put seats in the standing areas of football stadiums but people still bought tickets. They used to say that football was nothing without the buzz from violent assault meets with rival fans but now whole family's young and old go to games safely, in most cases.

We shouldn't be scared of change. The technology is there to keep the game flowing, split second decisions can be made off the field of play and paged to the ref. Bring it on. It's well overdue.

Grass Roots

Joined: 12 Nov 2005
Posts: 327
Reply with quote
yeekiat wrote:
Should/Would - the answers are both no!

And its even more daft if its phrased with "should" in my opinion!


Poor show Yeekiat, that's my opinion, you're making a fool out of yourself

Grass Roots

Joined: 05 Jul 2006
Posts: 123
Location: Roma
Reply with quote
Australia will definetely have a chance to play Italy again, they're getting better and better and they'll definetely reach the final phase in 2010 also.
It's not actually a re-match...

Grass Roots

Joined: 07 Jun 2006
Posts: 425
Location: Canada
Reply with quote
RWM wrote:
Italy should be disqualified for being the diving cheats that they are. Nevermind the rematch.


AGREED....throw Portugal in there too!!!

Admin

Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 17018
Location: Near Essex : Supports Arsenal
Reply with quote
come on it is over now , forget it . I am afraid that nothing you or anyone else says will alter the results of the past few weeks so better to leave it and just carry on .

Grass Roots

Joined: 06 Jul 2006
Posts: 32
Location: Australia
Reply with quote
I think some people hear are taking this question in a different light from the poster's original intention. Although I wish (cos I have national pride, GO AUSTRALIA), it is kinda wasting time. I only like to request a video replay judging by the refs next time. Did the Italians deserve to win based on that dodgy penalty? No. Are we Aussies planning to make a fuss out of all of it like our mother country Englishmen? no. We have to show that at least our country populated by English Convicts when the colony first settled knows how to behave.

I would say Australia's lost by the 'special' penalty is worst than England's defeat. The red was legitimate and they sucked at Penalty. Did Australians go out in the night to bash our italian neighbours? No.

Grass Roots

Joined: 06 Jul 2006
Posts: 11
Reply with quote
obviously there would eventually be a rematch between the two teams and it would be interesting to see who gets it. If only Hiddink would stay...and maybe Kewell would have the chance to play next time? We might not have made it through, but it still is pretty good for a nation who have only qualified for the WC twice in its history.

Young Pro

Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 2384
Location: Ireland
Reply with quote
Spurs4ever wrote:
yeekiat wrote:
Should/Would - the answers are both no!

And its even more daft if its phrased with "should" in my opinion!


Poor show Yeekiat, that's my opinion, you're making a fool out of yourself


your making a fool out of yourself. just my opinion Cool

Grass Roots

Joined: 23 Jun 2006
Posts: 130
Reply with quote
I wish australia could get a rematch...it would be 6-0 to italy with no ref gifts...

being so far away i never took care of these guys down under...

so people wish some experience are aussies as arrogant as they seem when it comes to sports?

Should Australia get a rematch??
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
All times are GMT  
Page 2 of 3