Reply to topic

Chose your winning team..
Austria
2%
 2%  [ 1 ]
Switzerland
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Greece
4%
 4%  [ 2 ]
Netherlands
4%
 4%  [ 2 ]
Croatia
12%
 12%  [ 6 ]
Italy
20%
 20%  [ 10 ]
Czech Republic
2%
 2%  [ 1 ]
Sweden
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Romania
2%
 2%  [ 1 ]
Germany
10%
 10%  [ 5 ]
Portugal
8%
 8%  [ 4 ]
Spain
16%
 16%  [ 8 ]
Poland
4%
 4%  [ 2 ]
France
6%
 6%  [ 3 ]
Turkey
2%
 2%  [ 1 ]
Russia
6%
 6%  [ 3 ]
Total Votes : 49

 
  • Steely Hill
  • Current Member of The Year
  • Joined: 06 Oct 2006
  • Posts: 15438
Reply with quote
marios wrote:
I think Croatia definitely has a shot at winning it, so don't get me wrong, but i think a lot of posters here are overestimating them because of the game against England.

Just because England couldn't handle them does not mean the same has to happen when they meet the Italians, the Germans, the Czechs, the Portuguese, the Dutch, the French or the Spanish.

Just think about it. Their team is pretty new and the only big opponent they've ever had to face was England. And i'm using the term "big" very loosely here, since England hasn't won anything in over 40 years (and that was at home) and has failed to beat Russia to qualification in their group.

Again, i'm not saying they won't or can't win it. I'm just saying you guys seem to be going a bit overboard with your praise. It's no surprise that all 6 people who seem to have voted for Croatia are either English or Russian.

Novgodorets, we've talked about this before. You can't call a team that has come out of nowhere, like Croatia, anything other than a "dark horse". Calling them "frontrunners" is not realistic, even if they do end up winning it in the end.

Get some perspective, people.



100% agreed

 
  • rrrrRonaldinho
  • Inactive Member
  • Joined: 20 Oct 2006
  • Posts: 3503
  • Location: Leeds Supports:Leeds, Roma, Real, Arsenal. Mourinho!
Reply with quote
marios wrote:
I think Croatia definitely has a shot at winning it, so don't get me wrong, but i think a lot of posters here are overestimating them because of the game against England.


Makes a change. They are normally underestimated. Been on the bandwagon for some time now. More like a year, but could be 12. Wink

marios wrote:

Just because England couldn't handle them does not mean the same has to happen when they meet the Italians, the Germans, the Czechs, the Portuguese, the Dutch, the French or the Spanish.


The thing that pleases me so much, is that they have NOT hit top gear yet.

marios wrote:

Just think about it. Their team is pretty new and the only big opponent they've ever had to face was England. And i'm using the term "big" very loosely here, since England hasn't won anything in over 40 years (and that was at home) and has failed to beat Russia to qualification in their group.


What will thier opponents think of the 10th best team in the world?
Tricky situation for them to think about.

marios wrote:

Again, i'm not saying they won't or can't win it. I'm just saying you guys seem to be going a bit overboard with your praise. It's no surprise that all 6 people who seem to have voted for Croatia are either English or Russian.


Maybe they could just see the huge potential, under the guise of what looks like a competent manager.
If they are English and Russian, obviously the matches against them nations will have contributed.

marios wrote:

Novgodorets, we've talked about this before. You can't call a team that has come out of nowhere, like Croatia, anything other than a "dark horse". Calling them "frontrunners" is not realistic, even if they do end up winning it in the end.

Get some perspective, people.


Greece were dark horses and hardly anyone would have put them down to win it last time. Croatia is different. Not always an indication, but look at where the money is going on Betfair.
They are 6th favourites, above Czech Republic and Netherlands. Only Germany, Italy, Spain, Portugal and France are above them.
Hey, maybe it might be on a whim and feelgood factor at knocking England out, but they are not dark horses. New power sounds about right, but I still stick with front runners.

You want a little bit of perspective?

Quote:
They are still undefeated in all competitive matches they played on home soil since 1994. They also qualified for both 2002 and 2006 World Cups without losing a qualifying match.

 
  • rrrrRonaldinho
  • Inactive Member
  • Joined: 20 Oct 2006
  • Posts: 3503
  • Location: Leeds Supports:Leeds, Roma, Real, Arsenal. Mourinho!
Reply with quote
Famous matches
Croatia 2–1 U.S.A.
Maksimir Stadium (30,000 spectators) - Zagreb, 17 October 1990 - friendly match

Spain 0–2 Croatia
Estadio Mestalla (40,000) - Valencia, 23 March 1994 - friendly match

Italy 1–2 Croatia
Stadio Renzo Barbera (39,000) - Palermo, 16 November 1994 - Euro '96 qualifying match

Croatia 1–0 Turkey
City Ground (20,000) - Nottingham, 11 June 1996 - Euro '96 first round match

Croatia 3–0 Denmark
Hillsborough Stadium (30,000) - Sheffield, 16 June 1996 - Euro '96 first round match

Germany 2–1 Croatia
Old Trafford (36,000) - Manchester, 23 June 1996 - Euro '96 quarterfinal match

Greece 0–1 Croatia
Kaftanzoglio Stadium (35,000) - Thessaloniki, 30 April 1997 - World Cup '98 qualifying match

Ukraine 1–1 Croatia
Olimpiysky stadion (77,500) - Kiev, 15 November 1997 - World Cup '98 play-off match

Croatia 3–1 Jamaica
Stade Félix Bollaert (40,000) - Lens, 14 June 1998 - World Cup '98 first round match

Croatia 1–0 Japan
Stade de la Beaujoire (39,500) - Nantes, 20 June 1998 - World Cup '98 first round match

Croatia 3–0 Germany
Stade Gerland (50,000) - Lyon, 4 July 1998 - World Cup '98 quarterfinal match

France 2-1 Croatia
Stade de France (80,000) - Paris, 8 July 1998 - World Cup '98 semifinal match

Croatia 2–1 Netherlands
Parc des Princes (50,000) - Paris, 11 July 1998 - World Cup '98 third place match

Yugoslavia 0-0 Croatia
Stadion Crvena Zvezda (47,000) - Belgrade, 18 August 1999 - Euro 2000 qualifying match

Croatia 1–0 Belgium
Maksimir Stadium (35,000) - Zagreb, 6 October 2001 - World Cup '02 qualifying match

Croatia 2–1 Italy
Kashima Stadium (36,500) - Ibaraki, 8 June 2002 - World Cup '02 first round match

Croatia 4–0 Belgium
Maksimir Stadium (19,000) - Zagreb, 12 October 2002 - Euro '04 qualifying match

Slovenia 0-1 Croatia
Stadion Bežigrad (10,000) - Ljubljana, 19 November 2003 - Euro '04 play-off match

France 2-2 Croatia
Estádio Dr. Magalhães Pessoa (29,000) - Leiria, 17 June 2004 - Euro '04 first round match

Croatia 1–1 Brazil
Poljud Stadium (30,000) - Split, 17 August 2005 - friendly match

Croatia 3–2 Argentina
St._Jakob-Park (15,000) - Basel, 1 March 2006 - friendly match

Croatia 2–2 Australia
Gottlieb-Daimler-Stadion (52,000) - Stuttgart, 22 June 2006 - World Cup '06 first round match

Croatia 2–0 England
Maksimir Stadium (38,000) - Zagreb, 11 October 2006 - Euro '08 qualifying match

England 2–3 Croatia
Wembley Stadium (88,000) - London, 21 November 2007 - Euro '08 qualifying match

 
  • Drogba22
  • Grass Roots
  • Joined: 29 Nov 2007
  • Posts: 7
Reply with quote
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/2641675.stm

Why England will win Euro 2008

Very Happy

 
  • Novgorodets
  • Grass Roots
  • Joined: 18 Oct 2007
  • Posts: 107
  • Location: Novgorod the Great, Russia
Reply with quote
[quote="marios"]
Novgodorets, we've talked about this before. You can't call a team that has come out of nowhere, like Croatia, anything other than a "dark horse". Calling them "frontrunners" is not realistic, even if they do end up winning it in the end.

Get some perspective, people.[/quote]

I do agree that I may be a bit overimpressed by their performance that Wednesday; but, anyway, the bronze medalist of WC 1998, the team of Suker and Boban can be hardly compared with Greece. "Frontrunners"? - are there any at all?

 
Reply with quote
Novgorodets wrote:
"Frontrunners"? - are there any at all?


Yes, I think there are. IMO, you can virtually exclude many teams from the start. In one of my previous posts I listed about 9 of them. That doesn't mean they can't win - anyone can win.

You must, however, admit that some teams are more tecnically and tactically advanced than others, and that seldom do the "underdogs" go all the way. Look at the World Cup, for example. Okay, so Brazil and Argentina were knocked out, but there were no real "surprises" in the last four. Some people even complained that the WC was "boring" because of this (you know, the "usual" teams go all the way").

I would also bet more on teams that have a manager who has at least played a WC or EC at top level, or who have managed to be at top level in previous tournaments. I would expect more from the likes of Van Basten and Donadoni and Scolari than from Lagerbäck or Kuhn. The same goes for some other teams, like Turkey or Russia - they have excellent managers who have always raised the standard of football of their respective teams, but stats say that they've never made it all the way. Yes, Hiddink beat Italy with S Korea in 2002 (B. Moreno) and did marvels with Australia last year, but did he win anything? No. Terim the same... Croatia, the same... Poland.... etc etc...

I'm not saying that any of the 16 teams has no chance of winning, but I can confirm that there are methods of judging whether a team in an underdog (or dark horse, or whatever) or not.

 
  • marios
  • Senior Pro
  • Joined: 30 Jul 2006
  • Posts: 3018
Reply with quote
rrrrRonaldinho wrote:

Greece were dark horses and hardly anyone would have put them down to win it last time.

Greece were indeed "dark horses" at the end of the tournament, but i doubt anyone would even call them that at the beginning of the tournament. I'm calling Croatia "dark horses" even before the tournament starts, meaning i do think they can defy odds and achieve some success.

On the other hand, some of you guys seem to think it's between Italy, Germany and... Croatia.


Quote:
You want a little bit of perspective?

Quote:
They are still undefeated in all competitive matches they played on home soil since 1994. They also qualified for both 2002 and 2006 World Cups without losing a qualifying match.

Is Euro 2008 going to be held in Croatia? No, so their home record means nothing.

As for the last 2 WCs, their only success in 2002 was beating Italy 2-1. They lost to Mexico and Ecuador and failed to progress. As for 2006, they all expected them to do well, especially after the game against Brazil, but they went on to draw with Japan and Croatia, ending with 2 points in their group.

Let me repeat my view on this: Croatia are a good solid team and COULD potentially win it, but i can't call them "frontrunners" when all the traditional European superpowers are in it.

novgodorets wrote:
I do agree that I may be a bit overimpressed by their performance that Wednesday; but, anyway, the bronze medalist of WC 1998, the team of Suker and Boban can be hardly compared with Greece.

I don't see why you're making this a Greece vs Croatia thing.

I was just expressing my opinion that it's unreasonable to call Croatia "frontrunners" at this point. I think the same about Greece, obviously. Greece are "dark horses" again, at best, and maybe Croatia are indeed better than us, but i find it funny that you insist on giving them all this praise when they have done absolutely nothing yet but beat several teams they were supposed to beat anyway.

In their Euro08 group they're supposed to beat Poland and the hosts Austria and are generally considered 2nd favorites in their group. If they fail to qualify it will be a surprise and a disappointment for many.

I guess we'll talk again at the end of (or mid) June 2008.

 
  • Novgorodets
  • Grass Roots
  • Joined: 18 Oct 2007
  • Posts: 107
  • Location: Novgorod the Great, Russia
Reply with quote
[quote="bigbroantonio"][quote="Novgorodets"]"Frontrunners"? - are there any at all?[/quote]

I'm not saying that any of the 16 teams has no chance of winning, but I can [b]confirm [/b]that there [i]are [/i]methods of judging whether a team in an underdog (or dark horse, or whatever) or not.[/quote]

Austria hasn't - even in view of the Greece's experience of 2004.

 
  • Novgorodets
  • Grass Roots
  • Joined: 18 Oct 2007
  • Posts: 107
  • Location: Novgorod the Great, Russia
Reply with quote
[quote="marios"]

I guess we'll talk again at the end of (or mid) June 2008.[/quote]

At the end I believe; I don't expect them to get out too early.
The discussion in the neighbouring thread (EC groups) is, in fact, on the same issue.

 
  • marios
  • Senior Pro
  • Joined: 30 Jul 2006
  • Posts: 3018
Reply with quote
Can't you sort out those quotes?

 
Reply with quote
Novgorodets wrote:
Austria hasn't - even in view of the Greece's experience of 2004.


You're may be wrong there... they're organising the tournament - Remember S. Korea in 2002 ? They managed to trick their way to the semi finals (B. Moreno... &co).

However, yes, I agree. As I've already said there's a good list of teams that "shouldn't" make it.

 
  • Novgorodets
  • Grass Roots
  • Joined: 18 Oct 2007
  • Posts: 107
  • Location: Novgorod the Great, Russia
Reply with quote
Who can forget that f***ing Mr.Moreno - but the gap between the peloton and Austria seems to be fairly wider than it was in the case of S.Korea.

 
  • k0br4
  • Grass Roots
  • Joined: 08 Dec 2007
  • Posts: 11
  • Location: Portugal
Reply with quote
Well, of course I want Portugal to win but I know that ain't going to be easy...I dunno why so many peeps are voting for Croatia! OK, they did a very good qualifying round but nothing else. Spain, Germany, Italy, France, Netherlands, Portugal...I think one of these are going to win!

 
  • Yessicajax
  • Moderator
  • Joined: 28 Nov 2007
  • Posts: 5215
  • Location: Amsterdam Supports: Ajax Amsterdam Hates: Feyenoord
Reply with quote
i hope holland will win.. but with marco van basten we dont even gonna win the first match im afraid Wink

 
  • AR84
  • Grass Roots
  • Joined: 24 Nov 2007
  • Posts: 51
  • Location: lisboa
Reply with quote
Yessicajax wrote:
i hope holland will win.. but with marco van basten we dont even gonna win the first match im afraid Wink

I think Holland is one of the favourites along with Germany, Italy and France.

 
  • ForcaSLB
  • Grass Roots
  • Joined: 24 Feb 2008
  • Posts: 94
  • Location: Newbridge, Ireland
Reply with quote
Portugal v Italy in final


CR best scorer!

Forca PORTUGAL!

 
  • Yessicajax
  • Moderator
  • Joined: 28 Nov 2007
  • Posts: 5215
  • Location: Amsterdam Supports: Ajax Amsterdam Hates: Feyenoord
Reply with quote
i dont get it why everybody is voting for croatia... they are defenetly not gonna win.
i think they just had a lucky day against england.
-x-

 
  • rrrrRonaldinho
  • Inactive Member
  • Joined: 20 Oct 2006
  • Posts: 3503
  • Location: Leeds Supports:Leeds, Roma, Real, Arsenal. Mourinho!
Reply with quote
Yessicajax wrote:
i dont get it why everybody is voting for croatia... they are defenetly not gonna win.
i think they just had a lucky day against england.
-x-


Rolling Eyes
That is fighting talk where I come from.
The Ed incident will likely bring them together...will go far....win it or not.

 
  • J-Axe
  • Current Member of the Month
  • Joined: 30 Jan 2006
  • Posts: 8366
  • Location: Belfast, Ireland
Reply with quote
I think the Germans will win it. For me, they're the best unit at the moment playing the best football and showing the most product.

I will support the Croats in honour of Eduardo though. He should have been there, and it's devastating that he's not.

Of course I always keep a close eye on all the Arsenal Internationals, but Croatia are high up there in the favouritism ranks after kicking out them English.

 
  • tam-cfc
  • Grass Roots
  • Joined: 17 Feb 2008
  • Posts: 42
  • Location: Scotland
Reply with quote
i would like portugal to win it but a think italy are going 2 be to strong for every1

Who will win the final phase of Euro2008 (last 16 teams)?
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
All times are GMT + 1 Hour  
Page 3 of 4  

  
  
 Post Reply  

advertisement