![]() |
|
yes sir |
||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Oi..
I certainly hope that the material I'm about to present will open some eyes and minds. To begin with, Miss AlucarD!!'s jeremiads are now a staple of his myrmidons' strictures. I always catch hell whenever I say something like that, so let me assure you that he frequently engages in violent fantasies involving balmy, adversarial hellions. Well, that's getting away from my main topic, which is that AlucarD!!'s dupes get a thrill out of protesting. They have no idea what causes they're fighting for or against. For them, going down to the local protest, carrying a sign, hanging out with AlucarD!!, and meeting some other incompetent desperados is merely a social event. They're not even aware that in order to solve the big problems with AlucarD!!, we must first understand these problems, and to understand them, we must point out the glaring contradiction between his idealised view of racialism and reality. Consider the issue of disagreeable, manipulative propagandism. Everyone agrees that many recent controversies have been fuelled by a whole-hearted embracing of huffy, unbridled circulars, but there are still some bloodthirsty freebooters out there who doubt that one difference between AlucarD!!'s secret agents and other dark forces of anarchy and hatred is that the former intend to paralyse any serious or firm decision and thereby become responsible for the weak and half-hearted execution of even the most necessary measures. To them I say: If you were to tell AlucarD!! that you can hear the crwth's fremescent clangor every time he tries to promote obstructionism's traits as normative values to be embraced, he'd just pull his security blanket a little tighter around himself and refuse to come out and deal with the real world. His thralls are tools. Like a hammer or an axe, they are not inherently evil or destructive. The evil is in the force that manipulates them and uses them for destructive purposes. That evil is AlucarD!!, who wants nothing less than to condemn children to a life of drugs, gangs, drinking, rape, incest, verbal abuse, physical abuse, and a number of other horrors. To summarise my views: This cannot go on much longer. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Wow, you really tried hard with that one, kudo's to you mate!
|
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
I dont understand a word of what you say, sorry, I dont speak inglish |
||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Crongratulations to the Jocks!
|
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Hiccup!!
|
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Stop it all of you!! You're exaggerating. Ben91, I hope you are joking, and that you really understand all of what you typed there. I have a suggestion for when you type such a long post: Use paragraphs AlucarD!!, leave it at that - you're wasting valuable mysql space. But I love the "I dont understand a word of what you say, sorry, I dont speak inglish". Excellent... This thing about Inzaghi diving seems a bit far fetched to me... You can't always accuse the opponents of diving when you lose. It's time for new excuses. You know, the dog stole my pencil case, the cat ate my homework, etc... Ben91 - I can't see the "marvels" you see in the "crusher" "Liverpool" you seem to like so much. You KNOW that Liverpool couldn't "crush" AC Milan, ever. THey never have, never will. What makes you think that - the fact that they're not doing so good in Serie A? It's not much to go by, especially when it comes to big tournaments like the CL. You should know that by now... |
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Liverpool fans should think twice before laughing at (or accusing) others of diving, when their own (English!) captain does it all the time.
I see Pool fans doing it on several forums and it's becoming annoying. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
The fact is every big team has divers and yes Gerrard does dive, but nowhere near as much as some other huge footballing stars, whenever Gerrard wins a free kick or a penaly it's always a ''dive'' |
||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
It's annoying how every last thing he does is constantly highlighted above others.
But what does that matter? It's ridiculous to say because we have a player who dives that we can't point out other player's who dive. Are we supposed to pretend we're totally oblivious to it? It's not as if i said "Inzaghi's a diving scumbag.. not like at Liverpool where there are no divers whatsoever" is it? I never condoned Gerrard's actions. The fact is, Inzaghi dived (or so i interpreted it as that).. the fact that Gerrard 'dived' against Sheffield United 2 years ago does not deter from this fact. Don't be silly. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| AC Milan vs Celtic |
|
||
|
advertisement