ok. Finally I can write my position after good football match, in wich I scored half once in the difficult situations.
I think we should begin with Libya. All knows that Kadaffi had the good relations with Russia. They traded between themselves. We lost our force after the breakup of USSR. And USA won(but not to the end) and they want to finish off wounded Russia.They asked themself:"What can we do to finish off this .?" They have 2 answers:
1. Ooo, we can attack them! They can't win because they were stupid and almost destroyed all nuclear weapon(we did it good. The media said that nuclear weapons are terrible(I don't dispute) and brainwashed all except USA. They(USA) said that a nuclear weapon is terrible but why aren't they seeking to destroy nuclear weapons?)
2. We can break their traiding relations and so they will have problems with an economy.
Certainly, they chose the second. If they choose the first, the whole world would be against them. Today the war isn't in demand.
They began to think:"How can we break their relations?". The choice fell on the East. Here USA wasn't and there sit people, who aren't friends to USA.(there were either the neutral countries or supporting Russia). They were lucky because in the East tensions were growing(they saw on the West and slobbered from "the democrary of the West").
So they put their people in the East and helped tensions to grow. All were going good but Libya...Kadaffi were a macho and didn't let to take away a power. Then USA and Europe attacked Libya but Russia didn't interfere in this and for NATO all was easy.
But in this situation WE showed ourself.
OK.OK, Michael. But why are you talking about USA if we are talking about France. - Yes. Just USA understand that if they attack again people will be think that they are agressive(so it's). So thay asked France to be agressive.
I hope that Putin won't let to attack Syria. And if NATO begin attack Syria then he will begin a war(alrhough I doubt).
I have nothing against people from USA. They are good people, don't aggresive. But if USAMan become a politician he become like a capitialist and agressive ..