It's not a joke Gazza. It's a fact.

Spurs have no history whatsoever?

Well then mine was an even bigger fact...

Compared to Liverpool Spurs have zero history so for you to joke about Liverpool is a joke and makes no sense....you need to take your facts as you call them over to the Everton and Newcastle fans,that's where you compare your team and facts because those two teams have also been missing for two decades

well it was set up for the Villa win after Rodgers talk up of Liverpool finishing in the top two , a superb second goal ...with the back heel ..etc . It was unbelievably the same old story for Liverpool ....plenty of chances ....dominated possesion but could not finsh ..clear penalty though for the pull on Daniel Agger's shirt .

Agreed, word for word.

When Dalglish was given money, the problems were lack of chances created, lack of creative players. Dalglish and Comoli splashed the cash on Henderson, Downing, Adam and Cole on a free. Ironically, none of them are creating regular chances, yet now the problem isn't creating chances, it's putting them away.

Now we're in desperate need of goal scorers but is it gonna make much of a difference? I play one striker up front and young Raheem and a rotation of Shelvey, Suso, Downing and Cole.

I told you once fella and i wont tell you again: i was not joking. If it makes you feel better, Spurs have been big underachievers for decades and will continue to be. I can accept that fact.

Can you accept the fact that Liverpool are a relic football club? Obviously not

Spurs aren't too different from Liverpool. The goal last season was to do our best to get in the top 4. Spurs did, Liverpool didn't but atleast we can say we got to 2 finals, winning 1 and now we're in the same boat as Spurs, Both in Europa League.

Now both teams are trying to get into the top 4, again.

Relic football club, huh?

And if attacking much bigger clubs eases your suffering then please continue.

No problem,can you accept clown shoes and a big red nose ? I only ask because for the last 20 years albeit from when old Arry took charge,you couldn't have been more humorous if you had taken to the pitch wearing them....Ask the Gooners they think you're "comedy gold "

For the last few years you have had a lot of the media putting a lot of pressure on Arsene Wenger for not winning a title in 7 years. I think the plight of Liverpool FC over the same time and the lack of similar criticism spells bias to me. When you figure how massive a club Liverpool are ,what they have done ,how popular they are world wide ,i think it's an absolute outrage they are where they are right now.AN OUTRAGE!
They can't even get close to Champions league football these days and to me that is not acceptable and the difference between the class in club ethic between them and Man U who refuse to drop to such mediocre levels.

Have you been living in a cave, and completely ostracised from the outside world ? Liverpool have been
the subject of derogatory comments and denigrating critique from the press for the last 15 years.

Monsieur Wenger's is only in its infancy compared to the much maligned reds . If you want to dance ,at
least learn the steps lad .

Agreed

I don't know what you have been watching and listening to over there but over here ,i watch sky Sports and read the UK papers from time to time and without question ,the ire and downright spiteful nature of the reporting between the two is no contest. I have not seen the same level of criticism aimed at Liverpool and Wenger's ARsenal.
I'm not making this up it's what i have seen.
So put it like this ,i am say a casual football fan and from the UK based news i am fed over here that is the opinion i have.
So i think it is quote obvious to me there is a lot of propaganda form the the UK media and the the comparison between the two clubs based on the history of them justifies my claim 100%.

If they were balanced in their reporting ,using the same criteria for their criticism then Liverpool would have overshadowed Arsenal 10 fold,but that is not the case. A massive club like Liverpool have been mid table through 3 coaches now where is the
balanced criticism ,so talk to me about knowing the steps boy.

I suggest you pick up the Daily Mail ,as they have never hidden their frankly distasteful agenda
against the reds ,you only needed to read the vitriol they directed at Dalglish, and how they
practically ridiculed him right the way through his tenure ,some even bordered on character
assassination .

I don't know how exactly you can possibly liken the recent attacks on Arsenals management
to be comparable to the disparaging asides Benitez or Dalglish regularly had to endure at
the whim of those media hacks who loosely fit the description of "Sports writers" .

As for being kept up to date by that great bastion for truth "Sky Sports" ,then I'm afraid that
speaks volumes for just how malleable some people can actually be .

[quote="redpelt"]

I just told you how i can compare it ,because i never saw it on this side of the pond from the very UK versions of Sky sport (Which happens to be the biggest sport media outlet in that part of the world). They have a massive agenda against Wenger and have had it for years. WHen Benitiez was in his worst slump at that club you can guarantee any loss by Wenger's team would get front story ahead of any Liverpool news. I have given examples here when it happened in the past.

I also gave my theories as to why Benitez never faced the same level of criticism a Wenger did at that point in time ,and it was because of all the top 4 team CHelsea ,Man u Liverpool and Arsenal only Wenger's team never had A british player as Captain or major role. In their sick way of thinking at least Benitez had Gerrad and Carragher as leaders of the English clubs
quest in Europe . The press in that country are a bunch a flag waving degenerates in the worst way and football evolution takes second place to blinkered patriotism in their warped world.

Now why didn't you say that in the first place ? At least now we can concur on something