Register | Search | FAQ | Memberlist | Usergroups | Forum rules | Log in
Please enter your username and password to log in.
Username: Password: I forgot my password
Reply to topic

Current Member of The Year

Joined: 06 Oct 2006
Posts: 13891
Reply with quote
they are completely different awards.

just like the Premiership Manager of The Year is different to the LMA Manager of the Year.

doesnt really add any weight to any argument

Current Member of the Month

Joined: 28 Mar 2008
Posts: 1070
Location: UK - Red Devil
Reply with quote
Steely Hill wrote:
they are completely different awards.

just like the Premiership Manager of The Year is different to the LMA Manager of the Year.

doesnt really add any weight to any argument


Wrong Steely.

wrote:
Fergie scoops LMA award
Sir Alex Ferguson has won the LMA Manager of the Year award while there were also honours for Tony Mowbray, Roberto Martinez and Graham Turner.

The Scot's award was announced at the Barclays-sponsored LMA annual awards dinner in Nottingham on Monday evening.

The award is voted for by the entire LMA membership and takes into consideration the performance of all managers during the season, based upon all the resources available to them.

It completes a double for Ferguson, who also won the Premier League award.

All the awards were presented by England head coach and LMA president Fabio Capello.

Ferguson has won the main award once before, in 1999, when he took United to a Champions League, Premier League and FA Cup treble.

He succeeds Reading boss Steve Coppell, who won the award in both of the previous two seasons.

Ferguson said: "It is a tremendous honour that my fellow managers and LMA members should deem me worthy of this award. I am very proud to receive it."

The winner of the Championship manager of the year award was West Brom boss Tony Mowbray after steering Albion to the title and promotion.

Swansea manager Roberto Martinez won the League One award, and Graham Turner lifted the League Two award after taking Hereford to automatic promotion in their first season back in the Football League.

LMA chairman Howard Wilkinson said: "The awards recognise the achievements of the managers across the four top leagues in England.

"Recognition by your peers is an incredible privilege and this year's winners should be proud of their achievements.

"The LMA would like to congratulate all the managers for playing such an integral role in another fantastic season."

Current Member of The Year

Joined: 06 Oct 2006
Posts: 13891
Reply with quote
Roonanialdo wrote:
Steely Hill wrote:
they are completely different awards.

just like the Premiership Manager of The Year is different to the LMA Manager of the Year.

doesnt really add any weight to any argument


Wrong Steely.

wrote:
Fergie scoops LMA award
Sir Alex Ferguson has won the LMA Manager of the Year award while there were also honours for Tony Mowbray, Roberto Martinez and Graham Turner.

The Scot's award was announced at the Barclays-sponsored LMA annual awards dinner in Nottingham on Monday evening.

The award is voted for by the entire LMA membership and takes into consideration the performance of all managers during the season, based upon all the resources available to them.

It completes a double for Ferguson, who also won the Premier League award.

All the awards were presented by England head coach and LMA president Fabio Capello.

Ferguson has won the main award once before, in 1999, when he took United to a Champions League, Premier League and FA Cup treble.

He succeeds Reading boss Steve Coppell, who won the award in both of the previous two seasons.

Ferguson said: "It is a tremendous honour that my fellow managers and LMA members should deem me worthy of this award. I am very proud to receive it."

The winner of the Championship manager of the year award was West Brom boss Tony Mowbray after steering Albion to the title and promotion.

Swansea manager Roberto Martinez won the League One award, and Graham Turner lifted the League Two award after taking Hereford to automatic promotion in their first season back in the Football League.

LMA chairman Howard Wilkinson said: "The awards recognise the achievements of the managers across the four top leagues in England.

"Recognition by your peers is an incredible privilege and this year's winners should be proud of their achievements.

"The LMA would like to congratulate all the managers for playing such an integral role in another fantastic season."


what exactly am i wrong about?

Current Member of the Month

Joined: 28 Mar 2008
Posts: 1070
Location: UK - Red Devil
Reply with quote
Steely Hill wrote:
Roonanialdo wrote:
Steely Hill wrote:
they are completely different awards.

just like the Premiership Manager of The Year is different to the LMA Manager of the Year.

doesnt really add any weight to any argument


Wrong Steely.

wrote:
Fergie scoops LMA award
Sir Alex Ferguson has won the LMA Manager of the Year award while there were also honours for Tony Mowbray, Roberto Martinez and Graham Turner.

The Scot's award was announced at the Barclays-sponsored LMA annual awards dinner in Nottingham on Monday evening.

The award is voted for by the entire LMA membership and takes into consideration the performance of all managers during the season, based upon all the resources available to them.

It completes a double for Ferguson, who also won the Premier League award.

All the awards were presented by England head coach and LMA president Fabio Capello.

Ferguson has won the main award once before, in 1999, when he took United to a Champions League, Premier League and FA Cup treble.

He succeeds Reading boss Steve Coppell, who won the award in both of the previous two seasons.

Ferguson said: "It is a tremendous honour that my fellow managers and LMA members should deem me worthy of this award. I am very proud to receive it."

The winner of the Championship manager of the year award was West Brom boss Tony Mowbray after steering Albion to the title and promotion.

Swansea manager Roberto Martinez won the League One award, and Graham Turner lifted the League Two award after taking Hereford to automatic promotion in their first season back in the Football League.

LMA chairman Howard Wilkinson said: "The awards recognise the achievements of the managers across the four top leagues in England.

"Recognition by your peers is an incredible privilege and this year's winners should be proud of their achievements.

"The LMA would like to congratulate all the managers for playing such an integral role in another fantastic season."


what exactly am i wrong about?


They are ALL LMA awards......you said "they are completely different awards"

Therefore the managers in the lower divisions have also been recognised by the LMA for their achievements, and have not been overlooked as your earlier post was suggesting.

Current Member of The Year

Joined: 06 Oct 2006
Posts: 13891
Reply with quote
they are different awards.

you are splitting hairs.

obviously they will be recognised in an award that is solely focused on their own division.

my point is that only once has any manager outside the top flight won the award. you dont think thats rather odd considering the english league has 92 managers and yet the winners have come from only around 5/6 clubs and mainly only one division?

i simply feel that the managers from lesser divisions should recieve more nationwide recognition for their efforts.

Current Member of the Month

Joined: 28 Mar 2008
Posts: 1070
Location: UK - Red Devil
Reply with quote
Steely Hill wrote:
they are different awards.

you are splitting hairs.

obviously they will be recognised in an award that is solely focused on their own division.

my point is that only once has any manager outside the top flight won the award. you dont think thats rather odd considering the english league has 92 managers and yet the winners have come from only around 5/6 clubs and mainly only one division?

i simply feel that the managers from lesser divisions should recieve more nationwide recognition for their efforts.


Yes you have a point, the thing is, it's the 92 managers themselves making the decision on who the TOP award should go to. Presumambly they must believe that the TOP award should go to someone for outstanding performance at the TOP end (the most difficult division in which to win anything) of the game. I'm guessing at that...I obviously don't know why they should cast their vote one way or the other.

Current Member of The Year

Joined: 06 Oct 2006
Posts: 13891
Reply with quote
yeah it just seems rather odd that these managers would always look to the top division when they, more than anyone, should appreciate how difficult it is to compete in the lower divisions with the many problems holding them back.

thats why i said id love to see how the voting went. say a top 5 or even a top three and how many votes each got.

Senior Pro

Joined: 13 Feb 2008
Posts: 4635
Location: Dundee
Reply with quote
Steely Hill wrote:
O Dogg wrote:
conner99 wrote:
well exactly ....whoever wins the Premier League gets the award ..yet the season has not ended yet . When was the decision made ...before last sunday .. ?


That is incorrect Conner.

Here are the winners since 2000

2000-01 George Burley - Ipswich Town
2001-02 Arsene Wenger - Arsenal
2002-03 David Moyes - Everton
2003-04 Arsene Wenger - Arsenal
2004-05 David Moyes - Everton
2005-06 Steve Coppell - Reading
2006-07 Steve Coppell - Reading

2007-08 Sir Alex Ferguson - Manchester United


Steve Coppell must be a magician.

he won the premiersip manager of the year while managing in the championship?

what a man.



Laughing Laughing Laughing


Anyway Sir Alex deserved it in my opinion

Senior Pro

Joined: 06 Sep 2007
Posts: 3506
Location: Warrington . . . . . . . Supports: Liverpool . . . . . . . . . Favourite Player: Sami Hyypia
Reply with quote
I stopped reading this thread up to the point where i realised the award was for managers across all of the English football leagues, as i felt compelled to reply. What a f*cking farcical regime.

It is bad enough that Ferguson, who added three £15-£20m-worth players and a £20m-£30m-rated player to a squad already champions, spending as much or more than any of the three other potential contenders, should be considered for the Premier League.

But the fact these so-called experts of the game think that his feat is the greatest of any manager in English football is sickening. The fact someone could have such a warped, delusional sense of reality is frightening – thankfully, or not, the accolade isn't due to this, but of course the product of another unfavourable trait.

Because those at the helm of our football associations have a habit of being via themselves the ripest depiction of cowardice imaginable. Bias, spineless, the negative adjectives could dwindle on into the infinite.

Senior Pro

Joined: 13 Feb 2008
Posts: 4635
Location: Dundee
Reply with quote
Martinez must have been close i reckon

Young Pro

Joined: 09 Apr 2008
Posts: 2640
Reply with quote
Phil Brown of Hull City should have won the award. He took the Hull side which only just survived relegation last year to 3rd place this year. Fair enough they did not win the league but they were not expecting a top half finish this season never mind 3rd place. It can be argued that they missed out on automatic promotion when with two games to go they were just about there. However, they are in a great position in the play offs and i hope we see them next year in the EPL. Well done Phil! Cool

Current Member of the Month

Joined: 28 Mar 2008
Posts: 1070
Location: UK - Red Devil
Reply with quote
Ben91 wrote:
I stopped reading this thread up to the point where i realised the award was for managers across all of the English football leagues, as i felt compelled to reply. What a f*cking farcical regime.

It is bad enough that Ferguson, who added three £15-£20m-worth players and a £20m-£30m-rated player to a squad already champions, spending as much or more than any of the three other potential contenders, should be considered for the Premier League.

But the fact these so-called experts of the game think that his feat is the greatest of any manager in English football is sickening. The fact someone could have such a warped, delusional sense of reality is frightening – thankfully, or not, the accolade isn't due to this, but of course the product of another unfavourable trait.

Because those at the helm of our football associations have a habit of being via themselves the ripest depiction of cowardice imaginable. Bias, spineless, the negative adjectives could dwindle on into the infinite.


I wonder if Rafa voted for Fergie.

Current Member of the Month

Joined: 28 Mar 2008
Posts: 1070
Location: UK - Red Devil
Reply with quote
Jackpot_Jac wrote:
Phil Brown of Hull City should have won the award. He took the Hull side which only just survived relegation last year to 3rd place this year. Fair enough they did not win the league but they were not expecting a top half finish this season never mind 3rd place. It can be argued that they missed out on automatic promotion when with two games to go they were just about there. However, they are in a great position in the play offs and i hope we see them next year in the EPL. Well done Phil! Cool


So Phil hasn't managed to win a trophy then. Ramos has more claim to the award imo.

Young Pro

Joined: 09 Apr 2008
Posts: 2640
Reply with quote
Roonanialdo wrote:
Jackpot_Jac wrote:
Phil Brown of Hull City should have won the award. He took the Hull side which only just survived relegation last year to 3rd place this year. Fair enough they did not win the league but they were not expecting a top half finish this season never mind 3rd place. It can be argued that they missed out on automatic promotion when with two games to go they were just about there. However, they are in a great position in the play offs and i hope we see them next year in the EPL. Well done Phil! Cool


So Phil hasn't managed to win a trophy then. Ramos has more claim to the award imo.


look at who has won it in the past, have they all won a cup or the league? Rolling Eyes

Current Member of the Month

Joined: 28 Mar 2008
Posts: 1070
Location: UK - Red Devil
Reply with quote
Jackpot_Jac wrote:
Roonanialdo wrote:
Jackpot_Jac wrote:
Phil Brown of Hull City should have won the award. He took the Hull side which only just survived relegation last year to 3rd place this year. Fair enough they did not win the league but they were not expecting a top half finish this season never mind 3rd place. It can be argued that they missed out on automatic promotion when with two games to go they were just about there. However, they are in a great position in the play offs and i hope we see them next year in the EPL. Well done Phil! Cool


So Phil hasn't managed to win a trophy then. Ramos has more claim to the award imo.


look at who has won it in the past, have they all won a cup or the league? Rolling Eyes


Very good point Jac.

Senior Pro

Joined: 06 Sep 2007
Posts: 3506
Location: Warrington . . . . . . . Supports: Liverpool . . . . . . . . . Favourite Player: Sami Hyypia
Reply with quote
Roonanialdo wrote:
Ben91 wrote:
I stopped reading this thread up to the point where i realised the award was for managers across all of the English football leagues, as i felt compelled to reply. What a f*cking farcical regime.

It is bad enough that Ferguson, who added three £15-£20m-worth players and a £20m-£30m-rated player to a squad already champions, spending as much or more than any of the three other potential contenders, should be considered for the Premier League.

But the fact these so-called experts of the game think that his feat is the greatest of any manager in English football is sickening. The fact someone could have such a warped, delusional sense of reality is frightening – thankfully, or not, the accolade isn't due to this, but of course the product of another unfavourable trait.

Because those at the helm of our football associations have a habit of being via themselves the ripest depiction of cowardice imaginable. Bias, spineless, the negative adjectives could dwindle on into the infinite.


I wonder if Rafa voted for Fergie.


Oh, is it voted only by managers?

Current Member of the Month

Joined: 28 Mar 2008
Posts: 1070
Location: UK - Red Devil
Reply with quote
Ben91 wrote:
Roonanialdo wrote:
Ben91 wrote:
I stopped reading this thread up to the point where i realised the award was for managers across all of the English football leagues, as i felt compelled to reply. What a f*cking farcical regime.

It is bad enough that Ferguson, who added three £15-£20m-worth players and a £20m-£30m-rated player to a squad already champions, spending as much or more than any of the three other potential contenders, should be considered for the Premier League.

But the fact these so-called experts of the game think that his feat is the greatest of any manager in English football is sickening. The fact someone could have such a warped, delusional sense of reality is frightening – thankfully, or not, the accolade isn't due to this, but of course the product of another unfavourable trait.

Because those at the helm of our football associations have a habit of being via themselves the ripest depiction of cowardice imaginable. Bias, spineless, the negative adjectives could dwindle on into the infinite.


I wonder if Rafa voted for Fergie.


Oh, is it voted only by managers?


Yes mate.

Senior Pro

Joined: 13 Feb 2008
Posts: 4635
Location: Dundee
Reply with quote
In the English Premier League, The League Managers Association Manager of the Year Award is annual award given to a manager from any division for his achievements in the prior season. The award is voted by fellow professional managers unlike the FA Premier League Manager of the Year and as a result consideration is also given for managers who inherit poor sides or financial difficulties and not only those managers who do not have such financial constraints and have won trophies.

Wikipedia

Senior Pro

Joined: 06 Sep 2007
Posts: 3506
Location: Warrington . . . . . . . Supports: Liverpool . . . . . . . . . Favourite Player: Sami Hyypia
Reply with quote
Oh, i didn't know. I assumed it had something to do with those in charge of the LMA.

Makes it a little more bizarre that he's won. You'd expect fellow manager's would recognise and appreciate a real achievement, and that his, relative to others, is not the best.

Current Member of the Month

Joined: 28 Mar 2008
Posts: 1070
Location: UK - Red Devil
Reply with quote
Ben91 wrote:
Oh, i didn't know. I assumed it had something to do with those in charge of the LMA.

Makes it a little more bizarre that he's won. You'd expect fellow manager's would recognise and appreciate a real achievement, and that his, relative to others, is not the best.


That's the issue that Steely and I were debating. If Rafa, Avram or Arsene had been given the award for winning the EPL title this year, would that have been bizarre too?

Even one of your own greats thinks that Sir Alex Ferguson has achieved something special this season. Taken from the BBC sports website.

Alan Hansen wrote:
Sir Alex Ferguson's 10th Premier League title with Manchester United - bracketed with all his other honours - has merely cemented his greatness as a manager. Why should Ferguson even think about retirement after building this team? A sign of his longevity and success can be encapsulated in the fact that United's win at Wigan to seal the title came 25 years to the day after Ferguson guided Aberdeen to a stunning European Cup Winners' Cup win against Real Madrid. What a career and what a record.

And this is why it is right to rank him alongside my great former manager at Liverpool, Bob Paisley, although Ferguson himself has said he has not won the Champions League enough and Bob brought the European Cup back to Anfield three times. But Sir Alex has got the chance to win his second with United when they play Chelsea in Moscow on 21 May, and they have an undoubted psychological advantage over Avram Grant's side because they have got that first major trophy under their belt at their rivals' expense.

On the surface Ferguson and Paisley may seem different characters and personalities when you examine the firebrand Scot and the quietly-spoken man from the North East - but they have so many similarities.
Bob was always looking to improve Liverpool's side, even after our greatest successes, and Ferguson has rebuilt the Manchester United side four or five times since arriving at Old Trafford from Aberdeen in 1986.

Paisley was an unbelievable manager, and he shared a great ability with Ferguson to motivate his players to win more silverware even when they had enjoyed previous successes, and constantly get the best out of players. Ferguson is like Paisley in his absolute refusal to settle for anything less than the best - they embody the old adage we used to have at Liverpool that "first is first and second is nowhere".

Paisley would never allow complacency to creep in and Ferguson is the same. We were always told that while you may enjoy success one season, it counts for nothing once the next season starts - and never think you have won anything until the medal was in your hand and the trophy lifted above the captain's head. And Ferguson certainly possesses the ruthless streak that Paisley possessed when it comes to making the big decisions required to keep his club at the top of the pack. Like Paisley, Ferguson is a motivator, ruthless and refuses to accept second best.

Ferguson is an amazing character in that his fire and desire burns just as brightly after his years in the game and the trophies he has won. The hunger shows no sign of waning. I have to confess I did not particularly like the build-up to big games, in fact I hated it. Ferguson, on the other hand, loves the adrenalin rush of both the build-up and the games themselves - you can see it just by looking at him.

He thought about retirement a few years ago and wisely decided it was not for him. He has been proved totally correct and he has once again moulded another outstanding United side, in fact this can be called a great side. Ferguson might have stepped back from management into an ambassadorial or directorial role, but he rightly recognised that whatever he did, nothing would replicate that feeling he gets on the touchline, being involved, building teams, working with great players and guiding them to trophies.

Some people live for that. It is like a drug and Sir Alex is one of those people. If you retire you don't get that rush, and why should he retire having built this young team with so much more in front of it? United's players also get the benefits because they are working with a great manager. He arrived at Old Trafford with the stated intention of ending the era of Liverpool constantly winning titles, which he has done, but he has achieved another feat by responding to the challenge of Chelsea when they were suddenly fuelled by the riches of Roman Abramovich.

Chelsea won two titles in succession under Jose Mourinho, but Ferguson responded and regrouped to take two Premier Leagues in succession for United. The bar has also been raised in recent years. In the '90s you could win a title with a very good side - now you have to have an outstanding side to win the Premier League. Ferguson's next challenge awaits in the Champions League final, and I have no doubts they have a psychological advantage over Chelsea by winning the title.

Whatever happens, they have a trophy in their cabinet this season, whereas Chelsea know they will end empty-handed if they lose in Moscow.

And for the great manager of Manchester United, it is just another challenge he will relish.


Sir Alex Ferguson is already a living LEGEND because of his achievements in football and you, Steely, Jackpot_Jac and anyone else displaying sour grapes over this award should understand that this award has been conferred because it is his 10th EPL title. A tremendous achievement.

Current Member of The Year

Joined: 06 Oct 2006
Posts: 13891
Reply with quote
you are such a wind up.

how on earth is it sour grapes!? my manager will never win the award. ever. im not overly fussed who wins an award that in reality does not mean a huge deal.

i am simply questioning and debating giving said award to a man who is already head and shoulders above 99.9% of the rest of his 'peers' in management in terms of money, resources, squad, power etc when there has been some outstanding performances from the likes of Phil Brown, Paul Ince, Gary Johnson and a few others.

the fact Tony Mowbray won the championship LMA trophy also is something i cant understand. his team were hot favourites to win the league, he had one of the best squads in one of the biggest clubs and among the most money. his only challenge was to avoid complacency. although i doubt you will bother arguing about that because it does not concern your hero.

Young Pro

Joined: 09 Apr 2008
Posts: 2640