Register | Search | FAQ | Memberlist | Usergroups | Forum rules | Log in
Please enter your username and password to log in.
Username: Password: I forgot my password
Reply to topic

Young Pro

Joined: 07 Apr 2008
Posts: 1108
Reply with quote
You all get too upset over this. It's a meningless award. Who cares who wins it?

Current Member of the Month

Joined: 28 Mar 2008
Posts: 1070
Location: UK - Red Devil
Reply with quote
Steely Hill wrote:
then it discredits the entire award, which happens to be LMA Manager of The Year. by that token Giggs should recieve all the player of the year awards. would you justify that just as much as this?


The fact remains that he achieved the milestone THIS year.

Current Member of the Month

Joined: 28 Mar 2008
Posts: 1070
Location: UK - Red Devil
Reply with quote
fakeplastictrees wrote:
You all get too upset over this. It's a meningless award. Who cares who wins it?


No-one is getting upset FPT, we are just debating a football topic, me and Steely like an argument over nothing Very Happy

Current Member of The Year

Joined: 06 Oct 2006
Posts: 13891
Reply with quote
Roonanialdo wrote:
Steely Hill wrote:
you are such a wind up.

how on earth is it sour grapes!? my manager will never win the award. ever. im not overly fussed who wins an award that in reality does not mean a huge deal.

i am simply questioning and debating giving said award to a man who is already head and shoulders above 99.9% of the rest of his 'peers' in management in terms of money, resources, squad, power etc when there has been some outstanding performances from the likes of Phil Brown, Paul Ince, Gary Johnson and a few others.

the fact Tony Mowbray won the championship LMA trophy also is something i cant understand. his team were hot favourites to win the league, he had one of the best squads in one of the biggest clubs and among the most money. his only challenge was to avoid complacency. although i doubt you will bother arguing about that because it does not concern your hero.


Yeah......I know I can be a wind up merchant......and you can be too on the odd occasion Wink

If you believe your manager can NEVER win this award then obviously it's not sour grapes, but Steve Coppell won it twice in succession with Reading which would indicate that it is not beyond Curbs to do exactly the same. However, your dislike for SAF does cloud your judgement on issues that involve him and doesn't allow you to be truly fair and objective under those circumstances. The award has been conferred because it is SAF's 10th EPL title.


Laughing

yeah but he did that by firstly running away with the Championship, something Curbishley will never do while with West Ham and secondly finishing mid table with Reading, something that Curbishley has already done with West Ham that means nothing. Curbishley would have to finish in the top 4 to even stand a chance and that just aint going to happen.

its not even that i dislike ferguson. i wouldnt say its clouding my judgement to be honest. i personally think Ince is more deserving and i dislike Ince more than any other manager to give you an example of why its not a personal issue.

like i said above, giving him the award on that basis simply discredits the entire purpose of the award. LMA Manager of The Year (the clue is in the title). withouth sounding like im trying to take anything away from ferguson's fantastic achievements i dont feel his past success should enhance his chances of winning this year. if anything it makes it even easier for his current team to succeed this season.

Current Member of the Month

Joined: 28 Mar 2008
Posts: 1070
Location: UK - Red Devil
Reply with quote
Steely Hill wrote:

like i said above, giving him the award on that basis simply discredits the entire purpose of the award. LMA Manager of The Year (the clue is in the title). withouth sounding like im trying to take anything away from ferguson's fantastic achievements i dont feel his past success should enhance his chances of winning this year. if anything it makes it even easier for his current team to succeed this season.


I think we are going to have to agree to differ on that point. SAF's 10th EPL title has been achieved THIS year and is viewed as an incredible milestone by his peers, just as Bob Paisley's 3rd European Cup was viewed as an incredible milestone. You can only gain recognition for the achievement in the year that you accomplish it.

Current Member of The Year

Joined: 06 Oct 2006
Posts: 13891
Reply with quote
Roonanialdo wrote:
fakeplastictrees wrote:
You all get too upset over this. It's a meningless award. Who cares who wins it?


No-one is getting upset FPT, we are just debating a football topic, me and Steely like an argument over nothing Very Happy


Laughing Laughing

very true

Current Member of The Year

Joined: 06 Oct 2006
Posts: 13891
Reply with quote
Roonanialdo wrote:
Steely Hill wrote:

like i said above, giving him the award on that basis simply discredits the entire purpose of the award. LMA Manager of The Year (the clue is in the title). withouth sounding like im trying to take anything away from ferguson's fantastic achievements i dont feel his past success should enhance his chances of winning this year. if anything it makes it even easier for his current team to succeed this season.


I think we are going to have to agree to differ on that point. SAF's 10th EPL title has been achieved THIS year and is viewed as an incredible milestone by his peers, just as Bob Paisley's 3rd European Cup was viewed as an incredible milestone. You can only gain recognition for the achievement in the year that you accomplish it.


Ryan Giggs for PFA Player of The Year then? Wink

Current Member of the Month

Joined: 28 Mar 2008
Posts: 1070
Location: UK - Red Devil
Reply with quote
Steely Hill wrote:
Roonanialdo wrote:
Steely Hill wrote:

like i said above, giving him the award on that basis simply discredits the entire purpose of the award. LMA Manager of The Year (the clue is in the title). withouth sounding like im trying to take anything away from ferguson's fantastic achievements i dont feel his past success should enhance his chances of winning this year. if anything it makes it even easier for his current team to succeed this season.


I think we are going to have to agree to differ on that point. SAF's 10th EPL title has been achieved THIS year and is viewed as an incredible milestone by his peers, just as Bob Paisley's 3rd European Cup was viewed as an incredible milestone. You can only gain recognition for the achievement in the year that you accomplish it.


Ryan Giggs for PFA Player of The Year then? Wink


That award is definitely for a players performance for the current season, and is voted on by players well before the season is finished, but I believe Giggsy does deserve some recognition for his incredible achievement of 10 EPL winners medals. As you have said "it's a completely different award".

Current Member of The Year

Joined: 06 Oct 2006
Posts: 13891
Reply with quote
Roonanialdo wrote:
Steely Hill wrote:
Roonanialdo wrote:
Steely Hill wrote:

like i said above, giving him the award on that basis simply discredits the entire purpose of the award. LMA Manager of The Year (the clue is in the title). withouth sounding like im trying to take anything away from ferguson's fantastic achievements i dont feel his past success should enhance his chances of winning this year. if anything it makes it even easier for his current team to succeed this season.


I think we are going to have to agree to differ on that point. SAF's 10th EPL title has been achieved THIS year and is viewed as an incredible milestone by his peers, just as Bob Paisley's 3rd European Cup was viewed as an incredible milestone. You can only gain recognition for the achievement in the year that you accomplish it.


Ryan Giggs for PFA Player of The Year then? Wink


That award is definitely for a players performance for the current season, and is voted on by players well before the season is finished, but I believe Giggsy does deserve some recognition for his incredible achievement of 10 EPL winners medals. As you have said "it's a completely different award".


Laughing

of course its different. the LMA is voted by the managers. the PFA is voted by the players.

if the players used the same logic you are backing then Giggs should by rights win the PFA player of the year award.

why should Giggs get any more recognition? in what form? perhaps the club could do something for him but certainly not the FA, Premeir League or any other 'impartial' body. he has 10 premier league winners medals, what more does he need?

that award is for the performance over that individual season and so is (allegedly) the LMA award. for some unknown (arselicking) reason ferguson winning the league has awarded him the title of best performing manager over the season with all the resources he has at his disposal taken into consideration. i just find it hard to swallow.

Current Member of the Month

Joined: 28 Mar 2008
Posts: 1070
Location: UK - Red Devil
Reply with quote
Steely Hill wrote:

Laughing

of course its different. the LMA is voted by the managers. the PFA is voted by the players.

if the players used the same logic you are backing then Giggs should by rights win the PFA player of the year award.

why should Giggs get any more recognition? in what form? perhaps the club could do something for him but certainly not the FA, Premeir League or any other 'impartial' body. he has 10 premier league winners medals, what more does he need?

that award is for the performance over that individual season and so is (allegedly) the LMA award. for some unknown (arselicking) reason ferguson winning the league has awarded him the title of best performing manager over the season with all the resources he has at his disposal taken into consideration. i just find it hard to swallow.


Logic tells us that the timing of the voting for these two 'different' awards prevents Giggs from being recognised for his achievements in the same way they are able to with the LMA award.

Current Member of The Year

Joined: 06 Oct 2006
Posts: 13891
Reply with quote
logic also tells me that any 'of the year' awards should be sorted at the end of the year.

Current Member of the Month

Joined: 28 Mar 2008
Posts: 1070
Location: UK - Red Devil
Reply with quote
The Newfound Resorts Managers' Performance table was devised to allow managers from every level of League football to test themselves against one another.

Every competitive game counts towards a manager's individual score in the League. Points are awarded for victories and draws, with results away from home scoring higher.

Points for clean sheets and goals-scored accumulate throughout the season, whilst a team's winning margin also counts towards the total.

http://www.leaguemanagers.com/awards/tissot-league.html?seasonid=138&type=Season+Total&x=14&y=3



The Managers Performance table also has a bearing on the award. SAF topped it last year but the award went to Steve Coppell who actually topped the table the year before, when he won the award for the first time.

Jackpot_Jac should note that Phil Brown isn't even in the top 20 over the whole season, although he has crept into the top ten in the last quarter.

Current Member of The Year

Joined: 06 Oct 2006
Posts: 13891
Reply with quote
Roonanialdo wrote:
The Newfound Resorts Managers' Performance table was devised to allow managers from every level of League football to test themselves against one another.

Every competitive game counts towards a manager's individual score in the League. Points are awarded for victories and draws, with results away from home scoring higher.

Points for clean sheets and goals-scored accumulate throughout the season, whilst a team's winning margin also counts towards the total.

http://www.leaguemanagers.com/awards/tissot-league.html?seasonid=138&type=Season+Total&x=14&y=3



The Managers Performance table also has a bearing on the award. SAF topped it last year but the award went to Steve Coppell who actually topped the table the year before, when he won the award for the first time.

Jackpot_Jac should note that Phil Brown isn't even in the top 20 over the whole season, although he has crept into the top ten in the last quarter.


but that table is so one dimensional.

it has no perspective to it. its no suprise which clubs top that league is it.

its hardly fair to suggest that Phil Brown is less deserving because he has not won as many as other managers at much bigger clubs with much more money and much better players than their rivals. Man United, Chelsea Arsenal and Liverpool are much bigger and better than the rest of the league. agreed? they happen to make up the top 5 of that list. coincidence? of course not. it is not a true measurement of relative success whatsoever and thus does not fairly reflect the jobs that managers do at their clubs

Current Member of the Month

Joined: 28 Mar 2008
Posts: 1070
Location: UK - Red Devil
Reply with quote
It's based on results, so teams performing well at the tops of their respective divisions should all be in with a shout of topping the table. Paul Ince is currently top in the last current quarter, Phil Brown is 9th in the current quarter, Steve Coppell topped it for the season with Reading in 2005-2006.

Does Paul Ince have more resources at his disposal than Phil Brown? I doubt it.

Senior Pro

Joined: 06 Sep 2007
Posts: 3506
Location: Warrington . . . . . . . Supports: Liverpool . . . . . . . . . Favourite Player: Sami Hyypia
Reply with quote
Roonanialdo wrote:
Ben91 wrote:
Oh, i didn't know. I assumed it had something to do with those in charge of the LMA.

Makes it a little more bizarre that he's won. You'd expect fellow manager's would recognise and appreciate a real achievement, and that his, relative to others, is not the best.


That's the issue that Steely and I were debating. If Rafa, Avram or Arsene had been given the award for winning the EPL title this year, would that have been bizarre too?

Even one of your own greats thinks that Sir Alex Ferguson has achieved something special this season. Taken from the BBC sports website.

Alan Hansen wrote:
Sir Alex Ferguson's 10th Premier League title with Manchester United - bracketed with all his other honours - has merely cemented his greatness as a manager. Why should Ferguson even think about retirement after building this team? A sign of his longevity and success can be encapsulated in the fact that United's win at Wigan to seal the title came 25 years to the day after Ferguson guided Aberdeen to a stunning European Cup Winners' Cup win against Real Madrid. What a career and what a record.

And this is why it is right to rank him alongside my great former manager at Liverpool, Bob Paisley, although Ferguson himself has said he has not won the Champions League enough and Bob brought the European Cup back to Anfield three times. But Sir Alex has got the chance to win his second with United when they play Chelsea in Moscow on 21 May, and they have an undoubted psychological advantage over Avram Grant's side because they have got that first major trophy under their belt at their rivals' expense.

On the surface Ferguson and Paisley may seem different characters and personalities when you examine the firebrand Scot and the quietly-spoken man from the North East - but they have so many similarities.
Bob was always looking to improve Liverpool's side, even after our greatest successes, and Ferguson has rebuilt the Manchester United side four or five times since arriving at Old Trafford from Aberdeen in 1986.

Paisley was an unbelievable manager, and he shared a great ability with Ferguson to motivate his players to win more silverware even when they had enjoyed previous successes, and constantly get the best out of players. Ferguson is like Paisley in his absolute refusal to settle for anything less than the best - they embody the old adage we used to have at Liverpool that "first is first and second is nowhere".

Paisley would never allow complacency to creep in and Ferguson is the same. We were always told that while you may enjoy success one season, it counts for nothing once the next season starts - and never think you have won anything until the medal was in your hand and the trophy lifted above the captain's head. And Ferguson certainly possesses the ruthless streak that Paisley possessed when it comes to making the big decisions required to keep his club at the top of the pack. Like Paisley, Ferguson is a motivator, ruthless and refuses to accept second best.

Ferguson is an amazing character in that his fire and desire burns just as brightly after his years in the game and the trophies he has won. The hunger shows no sign of waning. I have to confess I did not particularly like the build-up to big games, in fact I hated it. Ferguson, on the other hand, loves the adrenalin rush of both the build-up and the games themselves - you can see it just by looking at him.

He thought about retirement a few years ago and wisely decided it was not for him. He has been proved totally correct and he has once again moulded another outstanding United side, in fact this can be called a great side. Ferguson might have stepped back from management into an ambassadorial or directorial role, but he rightly recognised that whatever he did, nothing would replicate that feeling he gets on the touchline, being involved, building teams, working with great players and guiding them to trophies.

Some people live for that. It is like a drug and Sir Alex is one of those people. If you retire you don't get that rush, and why should he retire having built this young team with so much more in front of it? United's players also get the benefits because they are working with a great manager. He arrived at Old Trafford with the stated intention of ending the era of Liverpool constantly winning titles, which he has done, but he has achieved another feat by responding to the challenge of Chelsea when they were suddenly fuelled by the riches of Roman Abramovich.

Chelsea won two titles in succession under Jose Mourinho, but Ferguson responded and regrouped to take two Premier Leagues in succession for United. The bar has also been raised in recent years. In the '90s you could win a title with a very good side - now you have to have an outstanding side to win the Premier League. Ferguson's next challenge awaits in the Champions League final, and I have no doubts they have a psychological advantage over Chelsea by winning the title.

Whatever happens, they have a trophy in their cabinet this season, whereas Chelsea know they will end empty-handed if they lose in Moscow.

And for the great manager of Manchester United, it is just another challenge he will relish.


Ohhhh, one of my greats thinks he deserves the award? Oh, well, i must be wrong... sorry all, Fergie clearly is GOD, one of my greats says so... Rolling Eyes

/sarcasm

Seriously though, Hansen loves United and in particular Rooney. I've not read the above because i'll probably find myself cringing at how much he fawns over them.

It's a pointless debate really. Fergie's achievement is not the biggest of the football league - fact. Disprove it if you can. Then there'll be room for a debate. Until then, goodbye.

Current Member of The Year

Joined: 06 Oct 2006
Posts: 13891
Reply with quote
yes but you seem to missing the point. perhaps deliberately.

results are not given in perspective. for example Man United beating derby is treated in the same manner as derby beating Man United when its obviously a much bigger achievement for derby to mastermind a win against Man United.

you cant solely judge a manager on a table of results. hence why Coppell won it last year despite probably not even featuring in the top 25 of that list.

im sure you are well aware of this and are only producing such a list because Ferguson is top of it but i still feel i need to point this out.

Current Member of the Month

Joined: 28 Mar 2008
Posts: 1070
Location: UK - Red Devil
Reply with quote
Benitez91 wrote:
It's a pointless debate really. Fergie's achievement is not the biggest of the football league - fact. Disprove it if you can. Then there'll be room for a debate. Until then, goodbye.


What is the biggest Managers achievement of the football league?

Who has served as a top flight Manager longer than SAF and won more honours in the league. The only Manager that I can find that comes anywhere close is Newcastle's Frank Watt who won 4 titles between 1905 and 1927.

Current Member of The Year

Joined: 06 Oct 2006
Posts: 13891
Reply with quote
for crying out loud.

LMA Manager of The Year.

read that line out three times and once more for luck.

i will repeat it.... LMA Manager of The Year. The Year. The Year.

Not The Decade. The Year.

This Year Ferguson won the league with a squad that had been heavily invested in after already winning the league the Year before.. (ie a completely separate season) he is also in a cup final.

is this the greatest managerial performance in the entire country? has he overcome the odds with limited finance, playing staff, resources? has he led a relegation battling team to top flight football? has he taken over a club in disarray heading nowhere and turned their fortunes around?

Senior Pro

Joined: 06 Sep 2007
Posts: 3506
Location: Warrington . . . . . . . Supports: Liverpool . . . . . . . . . Favourite Player: Sami Hyypia
Reply with quote
It is not "LMA Manager of the last 10 years" though, is it? It's "LMA Manager of the Year".

Bristol City, newly promoted from League One to achieve 4th in the Championship, only just missing out on automatic promotion, pwn Fergie’s ‘achievement’ in every single way possible.

Even in the Premier League you have Moyes' Everton. If you look at their points total over the latter half of this year, last season they would've been on course for a 3rd place finish! It's only because the top four sides have performed so well, each with 75+ points, that they've ended up some way adrift from the Champions League places.

Current Member of the Month

Joined: 28 Mar 2008
Posts: 1070
Location: UK - Red Devil
Reply with quote
Steely Hill wrote:
yes but you seem to missing the point. perhaps deliberately.

results are not given in perspective. for example Man United beating derby is treated in the same manner as derby beating Man United when its obviously a much bigger achievement for derby to mastermind a win against Man United.

you cant solely judge a manager on a table of results. hence why Coppell won it last year despite probably not even featuring in the top 25 of that list.

im sure you are well aware of this and are only producing such a list because Ferguson is top of it but i still feel i need to point this out.


But we have the most competitive Premier league in the world, where, according to expert opinion (Managers), any team in that league is capable of winning ANY game, and generally (Derby excluded) the margin of difference in standard between the sides is NOT as enormous as King Kev leads us to believe. The recent Wigan v Man Utd game highlighted that fact. It would, therefore, in my opinion, be unfair to grade performance between teams in the same division. If Paul Ince can top the table from League 2, then Phil Brown has no excuses for failing to top the table with a League 1 side.

Current Member of the Month

Joined: 28 Mar 2008
Posts: 1070
Location: UK - Red Devil
Reply with quote
Steely/Ben

Are you two deliberately missing the point here. Yes the award is for this year....in which SAF won his 10th EPL title as well as topping the performance tables.

Current Member of The Year

Joined: 06 Oct 2006
Posts: 13891
Reply with quote
you will find the Championship is a million times more competetive than the Premiership.

if anybody disagreed with that they need shooting.

dont be silly. if that was