| MontyMagpie wrote: |
| Ben91 wrote: |
If i respected you, i wouldn't use the word "pr*ck" aimed at you, sadly when you decide to play insulting little mind games, such as pretending not to have edited your post, respect is hard to come by. I had nothing to gain by saying you did edit your post, and wasn't accusing you of anything, so cut the boring crap.
Look again? Why? It won't say if you've edited your post, because it only does that if someone else posts before you edit it. You wrote up to the "...in the top4 of spending. Where is that thread now?", which i read, then you added the rest before i'd finished writing my reply. It ain't rocket science.
|
They are facts not mind games, Liverpool have spent 50million and multi-millions over the years and may I remind you of the rules. Personal insults, as ever, are not tolerated There is no need for pr*ck again. It just shows that you don't have a commanding use of the English vocabulary to express your opinions. Resorting to name calling lowers the conversation to the level of a schoolboy. |
By "mind games" i'm referring to your petty "i didn't edit my post" notion.
I have a fine use of the English vocabulary, but i also have a mind capable of making a choice - when i want to express my opinions i will do just that, using comprehensible language that expresses my view in the best possible way. When i think people are just taking the (to appease yourself) "wee", then you can understand that i haven't the patience to bother explaining myself. If you want me to respect you Monty then don't pretend not to have edited your post, and such childish games. I only resort to name calling when i believe the other person in conversation with myself does not deserve an intelligible response. It's a conscious decision.
| Quote: |
| Secondly I never got those facts not from a thread I was looking for but from a website. You're continue to dispute it nevertheless but failed to back up anything you say with real facts. Far too many times now you resort to personal insults rather than state your case. |
I'm not disputing what you've said, because we did spend a similar amount to what you've quoted (Torres, £21m; Babel, £11.5m; Lucas, £8m; Benayoun, £5m). However, we also sold £20m worth of players, which you have to take into consideration.
| Quote: |
| Ben91 wrote: |
| MontyMagpie wrote: |
Leave the retarded stuff and the pr*ck insults out of the conversation, Ben. |
No. I'll do that when you stop playing puerile mind games and refrain from the patronising crap that fills your posts.
|
More insults even when I ask you to stop. Then I will give you a warning to stop it. The rules clearly state personal insults are against the rules. |
It's more of a statement than an insult; i'm stating what i think of your posts. I'll apologise for calling you a pr*ck or a retard, but the above stands.
| Quote: |
| Ben91 wrote: |
Everton are in the position they are because of both money and their manager, not one or the other. Liverpool can't be guilty of the same because we were once dominant, so we've fallen rather than risen... Money has kept us up there. |
Everton have spent less than Liverpool, Ben. There is no arguing with it. It is fact. You can continue to waffle on here with your insulting comments but you can't argue with that fact Ben. Everton have achieved almost the same with less money. |
Indeed it is a fact Monty,
Liverpool have spent more money than
Everton - however, without the money spent
Everton would not be fifth, hence their position is due to money as well as their manager.
Now i don't know about you, but i've forgotten how this even began, so perhaps getting back on topic may be better?